Hyderabad — After five long years of anticipation, countless delays, and sky-high expectations, Pawan Kalyan’s much-hyped historical epic Hari Hara Veera Mallu finally hit theatres on Thursday. But as the first wave of audience reactions and critical verdicts rolled in, a harsh reality became undeniable: what was meant to be a triumphant return for the Power Star has instead turned into one of the biggest cinematic disappointments Tollywood has seen in recent years.
Promoted as a grand historical spectacle that would mark Pawan Kalyan’s return to straight Telugu cinema after a significant hiatus, Hari Hara Veera Mallu arrived burdened with massive expectations. From lavish sets and elaborate costumes to an ambitious narrative steeped in folklore and rebellion, the film promised a genre-defining experience — one that would reignite the Tollywood box office and reaffirm Kalyan's place as a bankable star.
Plot Synopsis: A Thief's Unfinished Crusade
Set in the 16th-century Deccan under Mughal dominion, the story introduces Veera Mallu (Pawan Kalyan), a skilled and benevolent thief—a Robin Hood figure who robs the opulent Mughal lords to aid his suffering people. The primary antagonist is the formidable Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb (Bobby Deol), portrayed as a ruthless fanatic determined to crush Hindu kingdoms and their culture.
The Golconda Nawab, impressed by Veera Mallu's daring exploits, entrusts him with an impossible mission: infiltrate the Mughal court and reclaim the legendary Kohinoor diamond. The narrative positions this quest not just as a heist, but as a symbolic fight to protect Sanatana Dharma from Aurangzeb's tyranny. Along the way, Veera Mallu also aims to rescue the spirited Panchami (Nidhhi Agerwal) from a local chieftain. The first half builds this premise with reasonable clarity, but the film ultimately crumbles, ending on an abrupt and unsatisfying cliffhanger that points to a sequel, 'Yuddha Bhoomi', without ever completing its initial quest.
Performances: A Mixed Bag of Star Power and Squandered Talent
Pawan Kalyan as Veera Mallu
The 'Power Star' is the film's biggest draw, and his magnetic screen presence is undeniable in the opening hour. He injects high-octane energy into the action sequences and sincerely attempts to embody the film's dharmic themes. However, the cracks from the protracted filming are painfully visible. His physical appearance fluctuates noticeably, and his performance often feels distracted and detached, especially in the latter half. He is relegated to mere "elevation shots," with many action scenes hinting at the use of body doubles. The role gives him little scope to act, relying solely on his established aura, which feels insufficient to carry the disjointed narrative.
Bobby Deol as Aurangzeb
Bobby Deol brings a weighty gravitas and menacing intensity to the role of the Mughal emperor. He shines in his scenes, presenting a formidable villain. However, his character is severely underwritten and underutilized, appearing sporadically without the narrative depth required for a truly memorable antagonist. A peculiar choice of voice dubbing, reminiscent of a low-budget television serial, further undermines his powerful performance.
Nidhhi Agerwal as Panchami
Nidhhi Agerwal is perfectly cast, looking adorable and fitting the part of the fiery love interest. Her character has a promising introduction with an interesting twist, but this arc is completely abandoned after the interval. She is left with nothing significant to contribute, rendering her outstanding initial performance wasted. Inconsistent and overdone makeup in certain scenes also detracts from her portrayal.
Supporting Cast: A talented ensemble including Raghu Babu, Subbaraju, Sunil, and Nazar is introduced as Veera Mallu's intelligent crew, but the script fails to use their "intelligence" to any meaningful effect. The appearance of the late, great Kota Srinivasa Rao in his final film offers a moment of nostalgia, but the decision to use a different voice artist for his dubbing feels jarring and disrespectful to his legacy.
Direction and Screenplay: A Tale of Two Films
The film is a textbook example of what happens when there are too many cooks in the kitchen. The stark difference between the two halves suggests a clear directorial divide between Krish Jagarlamudi, who penned the story, and Jyothi Krishna, who reportedly took over later.
The first half is coherent, engaging, and solidly executed. It establishes the characters, the central conflict, and the stakes with moments of genuine directorial flair. The action blocks are impactful, and the narrative has a clear purpose.
The second half, however, is a catastrophic collapse. It is an aimless, chaotic mess ("gandharagolam") that feels like a completely different, and far inferior, film. The screenplay loses all focus, padded with unnecessary songs and fights that do nothing to advance the story. The much-touted theme of Sanatana Dharma feels superficially imposed rather than organically integrated, robbing the film of any real emotional core. The climax is the weakest link—an anticlimactic, poorly conceived sequence that feels rushed and utterly unsatisfying.
Technical Aspects: Brilliance Buried Under Blunders
Music and Background Score (M.M. Keeravani)
M.M. Keeravani's work is, without a doubt, the heart, soul, and spine of 'Hari Hara Veera Mallu'. His thunderous and evocative background score desperately tries to stitch the film together, lending weight, emotion, and grandeur to scenes that otherwise fall flat. The songs are well-composed and situational. Keeravani’s music is the single most praised aspect and the only element that consistently delivers excellence.
VFX / CGI
The visual effects are an unmitigated disaster and the film's most unforgivable flaw. For a production of this scale and budget, the CGI is shockingly poor, outdated, and amateurish. From simple horse-riding shots to a key tiger sequence, the visuals are plagued by abysmal effects that look like they were generated by a free AI tool. This technical incompetence shatters any suspension of disbelief and makes the film look cheap and unfinished.
Cinematography, Editing, and Production Design
The cinematography is adequate in the first half but fails miserably to hide the flaws of the second. KL Praveen's editing is choppy and fails to create a smooth narrative flow, though some fight scenes are sharply cut. The one technical aspect that stands out positively alongside the music is the production design. Thota Tharani's sets are impressive, detailed, and create a tangible sense of the period, though their realism is constantly undermined by the terrible VFX layered on top.
Final Verdict
'Hari Hara Veera Mallu' is a spectacular misfire. It's a disjointed and soulless epic that buckles under the weight of its own troubled production. While Pawan Kalyan's charisma and M.M. Keeravani's masterful score provide fleeting moments of quality, they are not enough to salvage a film torpedoed by a nonsensical second half and some of the worst CGI seen in recent Telugu cinema. It’s a loud, long, and ultimately hollow experience that fails to deliver on its grand promises.
Watch it only if you are a die-hard Pawan Kalyan fan who can forgive monumental flaws for a few moments of his on-screen presence. For everyone else, this is an easy skip.
0 Comments